Tag: community

Fridays Final Coming Up

17 July 2026

In times of chaos I find myself turning to my favourite book of the Bible Ecclesiastes 9:10-12: “Whatever your hand finds to do, do it with your might; for there is no work or device or knowledge or wisdom in the grave where you are going. I returned and saw under the sun that – The race is not to the swift, Nor the battle to the strong, Nor bread to the wise, Nor riches to men of understanding, Nor favor to men of skill; But time and chance happen to them all. For man also does not know his time: Like fish taken in a cruel net, Like birds caught in a snare, So the sons of men are snared in an evil time, When it falls suddenly upon them”.

Finals – I am talking about the soccer world cup on Monday of course, so who’s your pick Spain or Argentina? I myself don’t have a predetermined favourite, I just want to see a clean exciting game. A bit like this Council amalgamation thing going on right now really, but a problem is that the ground rules weren’t clear from the outset including goal and sidelines. And there isn’t even just one ball either, we are all just running around kicking about our own. And by the way if you hadn’t gleaned from recent social media messaging by some other Councillors, Taupo is very much headed towards the Backstop option of not submitting a Head Start proposal at all, because its all seeming just too hard. In some ways it would be nice to go back to the 850 or so borough councils that we used to have before 1989 (along with a decent Public Service), but we are way too far down the track to go back to that. So I am seeing this as a very great missed opportunity to do things a lot better.

Which brings me to describe what I believe is going on here: a Collective Action Problem whereby everyone acting in their own perceived interest produces an outcome that is worse for everyone collectively. Another analogy along the same lines: Prisoners Dilemma. You see, I have been talking to a handful of Councillors in the Waikato region, and the thinking is more or less the same – Hamilton doesn’t really want to get shackled with rural problems, and almost everybody else doesn’t want to get dominated by the electoral demographics of big place Hamilton. Fair enough you might say, because your district Councillors are after all only elected to represent their own local communities. But the problem is that Hamilton does actually subsidise the rest of the region when it comes to Regional Council responsibilities. So although Councillors aren’t acting irrationally, the problem is that they can be behaving against theirs and ours best overall interest. It also won’t help that many Councils like ours have staff leading the process, who can’t help but want to keep their jobs close to where they live now. By the way Federated Farmers have a preferred model for amalgamation which you can read about HERE – and they pointedly aren’t happy and want to separate rural district Unitaries from the urban.

Much of the debate surrounding local government reform has focused on what communities might lose, and this is understandable because Councils are elected to protect the interests of their own communities. However, this can make it difficult to consider opportunities that may benefit the wider region while still protecting local identity and democratic voice – that was really the role of the Regional Councillors whose role by October 2028 will be defunct. The challenge is therefore not simply whether reform should occur, but whether it can be designed well enough that communities have confidence they will not lose the things that matter most to them. We are talking urban versus rural, small towns versus big, and not forgetting Maori interests too.

One of the strongest arguments in favour of larger Unitary councils is their ability to engage more effectively with central government on matters of regional significance. Since Auckland’s amalgamation in 2010, the city has been able to present a single strategic voice when negotiating major infrastructure and investment projects with Wellington. The most notable example is the City Rail Link, a jointly funded multi-billion-dollar partnership between Auckland Council and the Crown, supported through a formal governance and funding agreement. Auckland has also been able to negotiate integrated transport planning, housing initiatives and, more recently, New Zealand’s first City Deal with central government. While larger size alone does not guarantee better local outcomes, it can provide greater strategic influence, stronger negotiating capability and improved access to nationally significant investment opportunities. These are genuine advantages that any future Waikato or Central North Island unitary authority could seek to capture, while ensuring that strong local representation and community decision-making are not diminished. It also makes more sense for dealing with region-wide environmental issues.

But could a large Unitary address the aforementioned trepidations around different community and area interests to still reap the big size benefits? There are definitely means and ways of doing it which I won’t go into now, but it certainly is looking as if it will be up to the government after 9 August to decide for Taupo. In the meantime a link to the excellent Lower Hutt Mayors proposal put out last week (read the full proposal HERE) which includes things like a first principle of subsidiarity (a big word which basically means local voice), legacy debt ringfencing, and careful delegated decision-making for Community Councils as below.

In addition, below is a clearer copy of the Waikato Regional Council (WRC) suggestion which I posted last week, and under that another sample model they developed.

Backstopping with no proposal at all and an attached letter of complaint to the Minister as this Council is most probably headed, to me does not correspond to a positive way forward or valid form of resistance which I expect it will be framed. It is basically saying that the status quo is just fine, which if you read my posts should know by now it most certainly ain’t. Recent talk in Chambers has been around us being more financially secure than any of our prospective partners – to which there are some grains of truth – but it has all been at your expense, so do remember that. And as for being kept properly informed about the Head Start process as we go, compare what you have been able to access about Taupo, say compared to these analyses in Northland and Wairarapa. But it isn’t quite over yet.

In other news:

Backpedalling to look cool: Mayor John Funnell put out a statement this week about having a relook at the Annual Plan (AP) just signed off a few weeks ago, because I think he has worked out that some other Mayors like Waitomo and Wellington took their election promises more seriously than he. Waitomo mayor John Robertson said he instructed the council’s Chief Executive to ensure rates rises kept in line with the Consumer Price Index (CPI), which is pretty much the most basic Key Performance Indicator (KPI) I think there should be. The main reason I refused to vote my agreement to the AP is the absence of regular and proper scrutiny by governance of Council spending including capital works, and going back afterwards to double-check after they have been approved like this is a very poor substitute.

Recall my numerous attempts in Chambers from Christmas onwards to discuss the revision of financial delegations from the current setting whereby the Chief Executive has virtually unlimited spend discretion? That would mean proper reporting on large items over $500K, and the recent Roberts St / Titiraupenga St works are a classic example of works never justified to elected members before they happened. Mayor John was so disinterested in that topic of delegations that he would not allocate any time in our induction sessions or even allow me to present 5 min in a public forum! So to me this is sounding very much like a hindsight act of desperation and the words sound very hollow indeed. I will have a quick look to see if I can find any potential savings, but the above spreadsheet snippet is an example of the sum total of information we are now being given – “line by line”!

Taupo dodged a bullet too: Far North Councillor Davina Molders points out some home truths about some un-costed co-governance deals her Council up there is attempting to push through the back door. Just as well we have whistleblowers like her prepared to do the hard yards, remember last years Joint Management Agreement (JMA) and who saved you then? That one ain’t over yet either, but I am guessing it will kick back up soon.

Sam Neil died in vain or vein? Knowledgeable Guy Hatchard has some very un-mainstream views about the death of well-known actor Sam Neil and hopes it will draw attention to the medical mishap at play. Worth a good read if you aren’t up with the play.

Fridays people pushing back hard: Here we have some Council bureaucrats in the United States trying to push their narrative down resident throats, but they just ain’t having it. People of Taupo, you have been getting this done to you for such a long time.

Fridays Council Blood and Guts

10 July 2026

So says the Prophet Isaiah to the exiled Israelites in Babylon in Isaiah 43:19 which is relevant to anybody who seeks a new beginning (makes me think of the Council mayhem now):

“See, I am doing a new thing! Now it springs up; do you not perceive it? I am making a way in the wilderness and streams in the wasteland”.

Some Councils have it simple like Hamilton & Waikato, they have few neighbours and their options are relatively few. Some like in the Wairarapa have even been talking about it for over a decade. Here in Taupo on the other hand, we are in the middle of eight neighbours (or is it nine?) with it never having come up before, yet in a total of just three months we are being asked to drop everything and come up with something new. Mission fairly impossible it has seemed to me from the very beginning, because not only have we got to decide but also to co-ordinate with our budding partners. For example South Waikato is putting out the option on left which includes Taupo but doesn’t match with any of our own options – however they didn’t bother asking us first (it is still a viable option, and I note they haven’t included the Backstop option as we have). Contrast that approach with Waikato and Hamilton City Councils which are more or less proposing the same. That doesn’t mean this process is impossible for us – in fact I think it presents quite an opportunity for positive change – but there is a distinct possibility we could get to the due date of 9 August with absolutely nothing to show for it. That’s not my preferred outcome and I will be somewhat disappointed if we end that way, but I’m just giving you the heads up. By the way, intrepid local reporter Bronson Perich wrote up a tidy article last week following our 30 June meeting to decide options, which you can read HERE.

The Labour party have finally come out and apparently said at a recent Local Government New Zealand (LGNZ) committee meeting, that they are not advocating for any forced amalgamation of Councils. What that means if elected into power this October is anybody’s guess because they are of course politicians, so that’s not really news to speak of. But I have heard the Head Start process of amalgamation described as akin to taking a sledgehammer to fix a nut sized problem. I think we aren’t really the nut being targeted anyway because it was always more about the Regional Councils, but we still have in the form of Taupo District Council a pretty big nut that could do with cracking.

On that note there was a very good report just released on 30 June by the NZ Initiative entitled “Head Start Done Right” which you can read HERE and listen to the podcast about it HERE . This is a must read for anybody interested in local government, and a real slap on the wrist to the way this government is going about things. I think one of their statements is quite perceptive: “The core argument is that New Zealand does not have a local government problem. It has a centralisation problem, and the standard reform response, fewer councils with narrower functions, has been making the underlying disease worse. The Head Start pathway sits in that tradition. Unless the architecture is designed deliberately, the pathway will produce larger councils with the same problems but on a larger scale”. The report instead advocates for an alternative principle of subsidiarity, which is basically that any function gets exercised at the lowest tier of government capable of carrying it out i.e. local decisions made locally, which seems to be what most people are worried about. This is practised far more effectively in places like Switzerland and Germany, and New Zealand seems to be headed the opposite way. I don’t disagree with much anything stated in this report, but I still see this Head Start process as a way of designing it in, even if we get to become part of a Council much bigger. This is an opportunity for change, and I believe it can be done.

So how do we do a better Head Start for Taupo?

On Tuesday we had a very interesting presentation from Waikato Regional Council (WRC) where they also presented a suggested version for a Super Unitary Council which matches the Taupo District Council Option A.

The decision for which option to proceed will be made on 21 July, and at present there is little enthusiasm in Chambers for Option A. The main perception is a loss of local representation, however I for one quite like the sound of it. It’s not the Auckland Council version WRC have in mind, quite different actually. But only if we get strong local boards (or wards as WRC refers them) with decent financial delegations and ring-fenced whatnot. You can watch the full one hour presentation HERE, and for the WRC Unitary model watch from the 35:30 mark.

As I see it the main potential benefits of being part of a much larger entity are:

(1) Increased professionalism – because we simply don’t get enough of that in a provincial Council like ours; and

(2) A bigger voice to Wellington – because size really does matter in that regard and Supercity Auckland is an example of that.

It feels strange for me to be advocating for this because the reason I left Auckland 10 years ago was to escape the Supercity Council, but there you are and I have also worked out that Waipa District Council are favouring it too. This is an opportunity of a generation to make Council better and we want to get it right, so is this the best path forward? I believe it really could be, if its done right.

Below is the WRC suggested model. Basically we would get lumped in the Southern Local Area (SLA) along with Waipa, Otorohunga and Waitomo, where Taupo would get 4 out of 12 Councillors deciding what happens for our part of the district. Bigger decisions affecting the entire Unitary would be made at the Council wide level where our SLA interests would be represented by 2 Councillors out of 8. I did also ask the question about a single entity like TDC becoming its own Unitary Council which Rotorua already flagging it may want to go down that path – and the answer was it could be costly. As an aside if you want an example of the things a Unitary Council gets up to, this interview on the Platform with the Mayor of Gisborne gives a clue.

Ok so what else in the news?

Dinosaur expectations: For a read about last weeks Annual Plan rates hike you can again refer to this Lake FM article well written up by Bronson Perich. I think Mayor John Funnell is somewhat missing the point with this statement: “However, the unpalatable truth is that it can’t be brought down further without deferring or cancelling essential work that we’re committed to delivering”. The fact is that the word “essential” is quite a subjective term in local government, and is about as subjective as the food you’ll decide for dinner.

Mangakino Pouakani connects marae style: there was a representative group meeting yesterday at Mokai Marae which you can watch HERE and read the agenda HERE. It was convivial enough and the kai was good too, and being on a marae you can be assured that the committee meeting comprised much less than half the time of what we got up to.

Engagement costs you: On that note, a little while ago I submitted the following LGOIMA question to Council which you may be interested in: Can you please give me a breakdown of what the $0.5M set aside in the 2024 LTP for Iwi engagement was spent on 2024/25 and 2025/26 to date? You can read the full response HERE

Emissions cost you too: On that note again, the Minister of Climate Change Simon Watts has said that he wants councils to make climate-related decisions that are “proportionate, evidence-based, and represent value for money.”( read the news article here) . Given that the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has just published the next generation of climate scenarios which eliminate the most extreme scenarios that have dominated climate research over much of the past several decades – so I guess that means we will soon be reconsidering the need for a new $3M gas flare for Taupo landfill?

Fridays musical pot at diversity in the UK, and I am assured the fight is very real over there:

Fridays Tail Wagging the Dog

26 June 2026

Bishop Desmond Tutu who received much venom speaking truth to power and was instrumental in saving South Africa from descending into bloodshed at the end of Apartheid era: “When people say that religion and politics don’t mix, I wonder which Bible it is they are reading”.

Hi people this week we didn’t have too much going on except that on Tuesday morning your Elected Members at Taupo District Council had a round table discussion about Amalgamation! Yes that’s right, although the government announcement was made way back on 5 May this was the first time we have actually got together for a few hours and mooted our own points of view – and next week Tuesday 30 June at 10.30am in Council Chambers there is an Extraordinary Council meeting (public can attend and is being live recorded) where we decide the way forward on the Headstart proposal due 9 August. We have only just received the agenda yesterday and I haven’t had a chance to read it yet, but you can have a look yourself HERE and it includes a summary of the public survey results.

And what can I reveal from our unrecorded meeting on Tuesday? I expressed some dissatisfaction with the general way this is being handled, including about the open-ended public survey with no safeguards from mischievous intent. I also stated that amalgamating with a much larger entity than ourselves should at least lift the bar with regard to professionalism that this Council sorely lacks. I am no big fan of supercity sized bureaucracies like Auckland, but little old Taupo District Council has given me powerful reason to believe bigger can sometimes be better in so many ways. After all, the citizens of Auckland were up in arms about their historically high 7.9% rates increase for which Mayor Wayne Brown is receiving a lot of flack – yet Taupo doesn’t have all the significant infrastructure challenges of a city, and we have been tracking that way for years! We simply have no excuse for not doing better, and its YOUR FAULT for not holding those you elect more fully to account. On a side note to that, last week or so I attended a very interesting LGNZ Zoom discussion with the CEO of Auckland Council and an Auckland Councillor for Franklin ward, and a point of view was put across that the new community boards after 2010 were actually more effective at community representation than the old Councils before the amalgamation (I did ask, but unfortunately this interview cannot be shared). Other things to note from the Tuesday meeting: (i) there was little expressed enthusiasm for buddying up with Rotorua, which was interesting; and (ii) some senior staff clearly want to keep their jobs in Taupo. Perhaps the motives are altruistic, but with senior staff comments like (my paraphrasing): “..a lot of people are employed by Council, and if they get relocated to Hamilton that would mean a loss to the local economy and social cohesion”, you get my drift…

By the way, to date your Elected Members haven’t received any comparative data on the performance of our surrounding councils, so we are very much having to do our own homework on this (luckily we have the Taxpayer’s Union report which the Council financial manager is scathing of but has yet to provide any figures to dispute). If I were a betting man and knowing as I do that in my time virtually every major decision in this Council has been stage managed or manipulated by staff to some degree – my money would be on us ending up with anything other than Option A.

If I were really going to conspiracy theorise, would go so far to speculate that some staff could even be subtly attempting to derail the entire process (“because its all just too hard…”) so that we end up in the fallback position of Option D which is the Backstop option to sit tight and do nothing until 2031 – if that ends up being the case, we coulda saved a whole lot of time and hassle already… Anyway the meeting next Tuesday is intended to set the direction forward so should be worth tuning in, noting that these options have literally been prepared just days ago and whatever we decide is probably irrelevant if our proposed amalgamation partners aren’t on board. This is why I reckon that Mayors and CE’s should be keeping in constant communication and we have received some placatory responses that they are – but I suspect they aren’t.

Other stuff in the news?

Ground control to Major Tom: Yesterday there was a closed workshop session of the Chief Executive (CE) Review Committee of which only a handful of Elected Members take part (many other places involve full Council on these committees, but not here). Nothing earth shattering to report other than some subtle rejigs of CE Julie Gardyne’s Key Performance Indicators (KPI’s) which as far as I can tell will not much affect ratepayer affordability, and the suggestion to introduce a KPI for the reduction of operational expenditure (e.g. by X%) as done some other places nobody was interested in. But I did have to gasp that even after repeating my dissatisfaction with the current Delegated Authority regime which does not require proper scrutiny of major financial decisions to happen, a few members of that committee were expressing that Taupo District Council is a standout model of prudent financial management! The rest of us on Planet Earth do simply not believe that!

The vote that changes Council? Next Tuesday 30 June there is also a full Council meeting at 1pm (as always you can read the agenda HERE) where I have submitted a Notice of Motion (NoM) Item 5.3 to amend the staff report template, but I am not expecting anything too momentous. I have worked out that presentation is just if not more important as the motion, and elected members have egos as fragile as eggshells to vote against anything if they are disturbed. It is based on a NoM sent to me by Far North Councillor Davina Smolders but tailored to a local flavour, and is intended to allow for more informed and transparent decision making e.g. options considered, opportunity cost, author qualifications etc. I think it will take more than just this NoM to turn this Council around but it is a start, and it will be interesting to hear the arguments against. As an aside, Davina tells me that up north they have Council meetings in fluent Te Reo for hours on end with English interpreters. Gaps in the conversation are strongly suspected to indicate when abuse is being hurled your way – fascinating!

Encouraging signs: Hamilton City Council is signalling a new way forward which includes $9.7 million of Development Contributions ringfenced to pay off debt, and an improvement of $20 million in net external debt compared to the draft plan presented in April. Well done Hamilton, even though you are a big bad city perhaps you would be a good influence to partner up with after all.

Golfer speaks out: On vaccine injury of course, with Michael Campbell talking about his own ordeal. And why is it that sports personalities have so much stock with Kiwi’s?

Were you there for Winter Solstice? Stonehenge Wharewaka was apparently the place to be, I wasn’t early enough in the morning this year but came across the witchy crystal ladies once. If you don’t have a clue what I’m talking about, you can read about it HERE

Fridays first reel by Duncan with Aunty Ann:

Fridays All Aboard The Council Train!

5 June 2026

To those who don’t yet understand those who do believe, here is a pertinent message from Anselm the Archbishop of Canterbury (1033 –1109 AD),

I had a question put to me earlier this week – where do I get the energy to do these weekly messages? It has become a disciplined form of manic energy every Friday morning to put it all together, but has become habit now and even though I know the readership is limited, I find it helpful to process the chaos of a lot of things going on at once. And in local government right now, there is quite a lot of that.

For whatever reason the government is hell bent on the Auckland Supercity model of which I am moderately familiar with. I am getting a sense more than anything though, that the politics and assurance of adequate local representation is everywhere the big question being asked. That will be a devil in the detail for whatever amalgamated entity we become part of, and for Taupo if we decide that we want to go a certain direction it will be largely based on fears and anticipations that local representation could be swamped by bigger brother problems of a city or other emphasis (as an aside, some are challenging the legal right of government to make these changes at all, but I have confidence in the powers that be to rejig the rules to suit themselves) . Sound about right to you? I have no personal favourites right now, except a wariness of being tied to another provincial kindergarten like here, or to an overbearing city bureaucracy. So will it be into the frying pan, or into the fire?

Taupo District Council put out a survey on the amalgamation to residents this week, with submissions due in just a few days time on 17 June. You need to know that this survey was released without the vetting of your Elected Members despite several of us requesting this to happen, and we were only informed of it a few hours before being put out. I have a few doubts about the survey which I will describe below, but more importantly it should highlight the mischaracterisation that just because we have elections every three years that does not correspond to the people you elect having meaningful oversight of the way this Council functions. I had a few depreciating words to say about due process contrary to the way this was railroad handled which resulted in our staff “Communications Manager” walking out of the room, but I do not put the ultimate responsibility on her – Mayor John Funnell is the one choosing to do things this way, with some prompting from behind I am sure. Last week I mentioned we had a steering group of several Councillors leading the way, but that idea has since been disbanded before it even started, and for no given reason other than I suspect one or two of its members were making things inconvenient. Yes it is a shambles alright, and I don’t know why our Mayor just doesn’t drop the pretense now and let his Deputy drive the boat. So right now for me, the idea of dissolving this Council isn’t sounding such a bad idea at all, and its just a pity we have to wait a whole two years for that to happen (timeline below).  

About that survey: Unlike the Western Bay of Plenty District Council survey which gave a shortlist of five viable amalgamation options, our one only talks in quite abstract terms, like “Team up with a neighbouring council”. Along with the dearth of information about viable partner options, the submission process to this survey is completely unguarded from mischievous bias as no submitter identification is required – so people could be submitting from New Delhi to Timbuktu for all we know. This means that the survey results could be virtually useless, thereby making us vulnerable to legal challenge if we try to use results to justifying any particular direction we want to take. And my reading of a recent legal opinion by Simpson Grierson about this local government reform, is that any Council putting up a Head Start proposal without doing its due diligence with the community is exactly lining itself up for that – so the more risk averse Councils could well be giving up now altogether. Anyway I am not trying to discourage you from putting in your own submission and we really would love to hear from you, but please bear this in mind.

All that local woe aside, what are some other places doing? Well I have to say that there are some clearer heads than ours around, and recommend keeping an eye on how Rangitikei District Council are doing things like this excellent 14 min interview with Mayor Andy Watson. I quite like their Councils social media page too, perhaps that is something we could emulate? Rotorua Mayor Tania Tapsell seems to be angling for a Taupo-Rotorua-to the sea kind of place, which in the Waikato times our own Mayor John Funnell is reported as not being overly enthusiastic about. Apart from that I haven’t heard too much else through the grapevine, and it seems that a lot of these Mayors could be keeping these things close to their chest and not talking much to their fellow elects – just like here.

Okay, so what else can we call news?

Democracy restated, or democracy undermined? Minister of Local Government Simon Watts has caused quite a stir with his recent announcement to remove voting rights from unelected members on Council committees. Although it was undoubtedly stirred up by Far North Councillor Davina Smolders and aimed at the overtly undemocratic things going on up there, this will affect every Council in the country from the Far North to Bluff – because everybody has at least one committee with one or two of those. But some places are more prolific than others, and sounds of alarm from Rotorua and Hastings seem to me to ring a little hollow (with one exception now being questioned in Auckland?). I have pondered this question before actually, because on the one hand it could be beneficial to have a few engineers on board an infrastructure type committee instead of leaving it completely in the hands of the amateurs to decide. But overall I am quite convinced that this change will be a good thing (even engineers have bias), and it should highlight why elections are so important for getting in wise people who can see the big picture instead of stacking the deck with those who can’t. Elections matter, and that means voting matters too – will people ever learn?

Politics don’t just pontificate: On that note, aspiring politician from down south Zoran Rakovic wrote an inspiring piece about the importance to get organised or stay forever irrelevent. For somebody like me who prefers to write about instead of deal directly with troublesome and unpredictable, too often disappointing sometimes even downright nasty people – I will try to take this in.

Deep diving into the mystical land of “Operational”: I have had some quite inspiring news this week about how things work elsewhere. You may recall my often voiced words about financial accountability and local lack-thereof, as it happens they are doing something about it in Auckland and Hamilton and even better than I have come up with. Auckland has a Value for Money (VfM) Committee which has been going for around five years and is comprised of elected members tasked with overseeing the VfM programme via: reviewing council operations; identifying efficiency and savings opportunities; commissioning deep‑dive reviews; and monitoring implementation of recommendations. This year they have a target of $80M savings and seem well on the way to achieving it. Hamilton have just recently started up a new Procurement Committee chaired by Councillor Andrew Bydder, whom I caught up with last week and which he tells me is more or less attempting to do the same. How so very refreshing, how so indeed! These go further than even what I have been suggesting for Taupo District Council which has been stuck in the kindergarten keep-your-eyes-and-hands-off-operational-matters style of governance for so long, it is no wonder rates here are sky high and even though we are relatively trouble free unlike a city or coastal place falling to bits every time a storm hits town. Damn, maybe buddying up with a place like Hamilton isn’t such a bad idea at all.

Turangi bus one step closer, or even further away? Turangi Councillor Sandra Greenslade gets in the news to advocate for a commuter bus for her town with mention of potential Ministry of Education hurdles. I am turning up to the Waikato Regional Council (WRC) meeting this coming Monday to see how it all unfolds, but I’ll give you a heads up clue right now – don’t expect anybody to go out of their way for you, if you can’t be bothered to lift a finger for yourselves.

Another crash outside Chem Warehouse: As reported recently in social media, picture on right. To answer your questions: 1/ Yes I am a traffic engineer 2/ Yes it needs a roundabout 3/ No it wouldn’t cost much. 4/ Because Kindy Council doesn’t let me near it.

Ombudsman on the way: To rescue us from opacity and behind closed doors governance, that is. Last month I lodged a complaint about the refusal of the Chair Te Wharau Walker Junior to audio-visual record the Turangi Co-governance Committee which the Ombudsman is currently looking into, and this Wednesday just gone Chair and Mayor John Funnell unbelievably did the same! I tell ya folks, the next two years is gonna feel like ten… But people of Turangi and everywhere else, I need to tell you: You are allowed to make your own audio or video recording of Council or Committee meetings, and nobody can stop you. The relevant section of our Standing Orders I give below, and note it is “notified” and not “asked”.

A Crux worth reading: I have heard us referred to as the poor man’s Queenstown before and perhaps they are right. But they do have some quality reporting going on down there worth a read, like this article here (you may need to email subscribe) where I love the killer line near the end which is just SO relevant to here:

“Under (new Queenstown Mayor) Glover’s leadership our councillors seem to have been conned into thinking that if they are all really nice to the senior council staff – everything will be fine. God help us“.

An important aside: I came across this commentator Nigel Anthony Gray who has a fairly solid social media following, and his article about the new anti-stalker laws seem a little worrying. Read more about them here if you like, and if he’s right then duncandoestaupo and the like could be headed for some jail time don’t you think?

Fridays Poli..Poli..Poli..Politician:

Fridays Lock-Me-Up-And-Throw-Away-The Key

22 May 2026

Exodus 18:17-23 with a message about wise leadership: “So Moses’ father-in-law said to him, “The thing that you do is not good. Both you and these people who are with you will surely wear yourselves out. For this thing is too much for you; you are not able to perform it by yourself. Listen now to my voice; I will give you counsel, and God will be with you: Stand before God for the people, so that you may bring the difficulties to God. And you shall teach them the statutes and the laws, and show them the way in which they must walk and the work they must do. Moreover you shall select from all the people able men, such as fear God, men of truth, hating covetousness; and place such over them to be rulers of thousands, rulers of hundreds, rulers of fifties, and rulers of tens. And let them judge the people at all times. Then it will be that every great matter they shall bring to you, but every small matter they themselves shall judge. So it will be easier for you, for they will bear the burden with you. If you do this thing, and God so commands you, then you will be able to endure, and all this people will also go to their place in peace.”

Your friendly Councillor Duncan reporting in again, and change is definitely in the air. On Tuesday Taupo Mayor John Funnell has this week instigated a working group to steer the internal amalgamation discussions, comprising himself and Councillors Taylor, Murch, de Lautour and Greenslade reporting back to the rest of us at regular intervals. The particular make-up of this working group was not fully explained and some reservations were expressed that the rest of Elected Members not being invited to fully participate – but there there it is. The question of whether we will be early engaging or consulting with the community like Western Bay of Plenty District Council is about to do did also come up, but the answer was not very forthcoming – so for now I will take that as a no. I myself am keeping an eye on the headlines and talking here and there with Councillors in adjacent districts whom I am acquainted with, and am receiving some interesting perspectives sent to me from local people too. Time to start having some real conversations I reckon with only a couple of months to go, and Councillor Hope Woodward is already trying to kick that off on social media which you can watch HERE.

This week we had a couple of things going on. On Monday we had the second of our Taupo Airport Authority Committee meetings, held at the airport. I do have to say that of all the committees that I have been involved in the past three years or so, this committee has been by far the most convivial and one of the most engaging. It probably helps that the surroundings are so pleasant (the Lil Something airport cafe is easily my favourite coffee haunt in all of Taupo), where people talk to each other like adults and there is none of the politic bickering that seems to happen anyplace else. The newly elected Chair is Chris Grace who is a wonderful and recent retired gentleman of ex Pak n Sav fame, and he was also with us as a member last term. Other Elected Members apart from myself are Councilor Steve Mananui and of course Mayor John Funnell who is obviously taking a keen interest. I know the airport isn’t of huge interest to everybody, and there isn’t a huge amount of news to tell except that members are pressing to more quicky develop a Master Plan for the airport precinct and get some more income generated instead of relying upon fickle Air NZ who could potentially withdraw any time they wish (remember that Rotorua is only an hour away, which is closer than many Aucklanders to their own airport). There is also the untrivial matter of a main runway that may need a $5M or so rebuild in not so many years away – luckily we have a great deal with Ministry of Transport where they pay half the costs and we keep all the profits, long may that continue. These meetings are open to the public (who rarely attend, but this week we had around six people which was a record) with agendas as always available HERE. They are not audio-video recorded but I will request this start happening, because I reckon the airport precinct is a bit of a hidden jewel for the district and something that people should perhaps take more interest in.

We also had a Regulatory Committee meeting on Tuesday which you can watch here if you have an hour to spare. There was only a couple of items for us to get stuck into and make something of a meal of. First there was Item 5.2 Bombay Bistros successful bid to remove three parking spaces from Robert Street for their purpose as a dining area (outside the old Dominoes). You can watch the owners oral submission and the 25min or so debate from HERE. Which I think is fair enough to request, but which myself and Councillor Woodward objected to on the grounds this was a piecemeal approach on the fairly unsubstantiated basis that it will increase the vibrancy of the area – by that argument, why don’t we just remove all car parking from the CBD altogether? Apparently the adjacent businesses KFC and Lone Star are okay with it, but I say the entire street should have been consulted – which they weren’t – with Chairperson Councillor Rachel Cameron implying they would be biased anyway. I’m telling ya people, this sorta thing would not happen in a place like Remuera where shopper car parking spaces get treated like gold – so perhaps amalgamating with a place like Hamilton wouldn’t be such a bad thing after all.

Then there was Item 5.4 which was to inform us about an upcoming Taupo District Wide Reserves Management Plan Project which you can watch from HERE. This seemingly innocuous item I chose to take some issue with because of my past experience with the Motutere Reserve Management Plan Review the year before last which I have already written copiously about. The Reserves Act requires management plans to be kept under continuous review, but it does not prescribe expiry dates or require wholesale rewrites simply because a plan is considered “old” – and what is old anyway? One of the plans listed here dates from 2022, and others from 2015 and 2017, which do not seem especially old to me. I later came to the view that the Motutere review need not have proceeded at all, because not proceeding was itself an entirely realistic and practicable option which was not properly presented then and even more so with these now. So my first and foremost question was is: Why is this now being presented to Elected Members as informational only? These reviews cost staff time, consultant time, and community time. What specific problems are we trying to solve, that are so unworkable that targeted amendments cannot fix? Or are we just creating a process of planning for planning’s sake to create jobs for the staff to do? We also need to be very mindful of public confidence in these processes – whether they are transparent and whether their input will be meaningful. Consultation is supposed to be genuinely open-minded and capable of affecting outcomes, but not in a way that will be disproportionately influenced by vocal minority interests – as I believe did happen with Motutere. What is to stop that happening again? Anyway there is also a presented paper on this topic next Tuesday 1pm 26 May in the full Council meeting which I intend to speak more to. In the meantime I have also asked the Chief Executive to be provided the answer to this question in advance: Can you please tell me the expected cost including estimated staff time and any consultants for the Reserve Management Plan project?

Oh yes and there was that one other little thing about the Broadlands Road landfill which was also discussed in a confidential workshop Tuesday morning. Myself and Councillor Woodward requested beforehand that it did not justify the secrecy, and also agreed afterward about it too. To cut a long story short – the landfill is forecast to be full by end of 2027 with a new resource consent required to expand, and Taupo District Council have left things too late to get it all done and over with in time for Environment Court if objections are received to drag things on. And yes, any objections are likely to stem from the cultural objections of neighbouring land owners, which is why there have been around 14 hapu meetings at maraes about the place in the past few months to try and convince that it is in nobodies best interest if things take that path – starting 2028 we are talking roughly an additional $4M annual costs to truck out waste to places like Hampton Downs (so think an extra 4% rise in your rates). So this is quite a monumental cock-up in my opinion and I am spilling the beans – so go ahead, lock me up and throw away the key. Anyway we are not the only place having backroom conversations when we shouldn’t, as Rotorua Councillor Robert Lee has recently posted about on social media which you can read about HERE, and I agree with this 2025 unsuccessful South Waikato candidate sentiment below:

So what else is new?

Keeping it up Sophie: Local intrepid reporter Sophie M Smith put out a couple of articles of interest this week, the first being Part three in a series about the Council building where it is revealed that the lease hasn’t actually been signed off yet. Yes well, after taking office in October 2022 it was pretty much explained to us Elected Members that it was a done deal and all that needed to happen was approving the $5M office fitout, and the question of it being optional was certainly never raised as a possibility. So the question now given the proposed amalgamation just has to be – what are the ramifications if it doesn’t get signed? On the flip side, at least a 25 yr lease might ensure a Council staff local presence instead of a head office Hamilton… There is also Sophie’s take on Amalgamation and an item on the dubious state of some Mangakino wastewater storage tanks allegedly leaking into the nearby waterways with no forthcoming explanations.

Zebra the problem? Following the incident on 11 May where a pedestrian was struck outside Taharepa shops I am doing what any traffic engineer worth their salt would do and checking out if Council is at least partly to blame. That zebra crossing where it happened was only upgraded a year or so ago and I managed to dig up the independent safety audit where it was noted as a serious safety concern with a recommended speed hump(s) as a solution. Why that didn’t happen is not entirely clear, but I intend to find out because if they had been implemented the consequences may have been lesser.

Proper oversight or lip-service tick-boxing? Kaipara District Council are currently under scrutiny by the Audit Office for their procurement and contract practices. I have no idea what stimulated this but somebody has obviously talked so it will be interesting to see where that inquiry goes. Another space to watch.

How to fix Maori Trust Boards: Now this is a topic I have been thinking of delving into for some time now, but it seems that Whanganui Uri Unite is already making some inroads as this social media post amply shows with this intro: “Have a GOOD look at the names and connections across your current river entity and land entity: • Trustees becoming contractors • Family members employed across entities • Operational roles staying within the same circles • Contracts repeatedly landing with connected people • The same whānau names appearing everywhere you turn”... I am not saying that Tuwharetoa Maori Trust Board works like this, but can anybody properly in the know with their hand on their heart says it doesn’t?

Homeschoolers under threat: If you are a Taupo homeschooler you will undoubtedly already be aware, that the government is trying to throw a spanner in the works with a last minute amendment bill which is not innocuous at all and intended to introduce increased government scrutiny to people who choose to opt out of the state system. The amendment is shown left, and people like Cynthia Hancox are activating the resistance now for apparently the first profound change in homeschooling oversight since 1989. Although my own kids are nearly all through their schooling now, as a homeschool dad myself this is quite disturbing – so watch this space.

Fridays poem of the week, with Peter Hitchens response to a panel question the others dodged – does poetry matter to you?

Fridays Flashy Burnout

1 May 2026

Genesis 37:5: “Now Joseph had a dream, and he told it to his brothers; and they hated him even more. So he said to them, “Please hear this dream which I have dreamed: There we were, binding sheaves in the field. Then behold, my sheaf arose and also stood upright; and indeed your sheaves stood all around and bowed down to my sheaf”.

Perhaps Joseph wasn’t the best diplomat in his younger days, but things ended up well enough with him in charge of Egypt and able to feed his family through a severe seven-year famine. But he had to be hurled in a pit and imprisoned in a far off land before that could happen, so if you are going through a rough patch too and not all of your own making – maybe, just maybe, it was put there for a reason.

Civil War – couldn’t happen here, right? I’m not so sure. Talking to a fellow from Serbia last week, he says before the strife started over there in the nineties they were all happy families too. Catholics, Orthodox and Moslem all worked, lived together and intermarriage was common – but in the space of just weeks they were at each others throats. Yes, it can happen that quickly, and my pal said don’t ever think that it can’t happen here. The tensions there are all gone now, but only after much bloodletting and new countries coming into being – so war does fix some things. People don’t be so naive that it can’t happen here, and my Serbian pal says he can see some omenous signs. Political leaders need to talk our way out of this, because we can become a Yugoslavia too. Don’t just call me a pessimist, I am only getting real.

Okay on Tuesday we had the April Council meeting which you can watch HERE and read the minutes HERE. The items were fairly mundane this time round and I was prepared to put money that it would be all over in less than an hour, but boy was I wrong there! Two hours later we were still gasbagging on about this or that, and yet everything got tick-boxed anyway – I can tell you this would NOT have happened last term!

The new Three Waters Asset Management policy was approved in Item 5.2 (watch from HERE), where I once again took the chance to put forth my perception of this new Water Services Committee as one where compliance is treated as No.1 with affordability only being a secondary consideration. “Safe drinking water” is apparently whatever the standards tell us it is, and it is to be had at simply any cost. On that note, on 26 April local retired civil engineer Phil Shields wrote a gem of a letter to us all challenging why $1.6M is being spent on a water main renewal project in Omori which serves just 130 properties. You can read the letter HERE, with his recommended course of actions below and to which I look forward to reading our Mayors response:

So please do keep at it Mr Shields, and I do heartily appreciate your educated input. That last recommendation for a new Financial Committee I do especially agree with, and a month ago put up my own 15 min argument for it which you can watch HERE.

Apart from that, the only other thing of note was Item 5.6 where Fees and Charges are being proposed to be hiked upwards for Animal Management (dogs mostly), Food Licensing and Resource Management. You will get to have your say on these later on because they are apparently going to be publically consulted. You can watch it from HERE, and it is fair to say that there was a little bit of disquiet amongst a few of us around the table regarding some of the hourly rates especially ($245/hr for consent staff?). Some charts to compare with other Councils were gratefully provided, and although we are on the higher end of the range even these aren’t able to tell the whole story. My take is that the ultimate test of efficiency is if you are losing customers to the competition, but a fundamental problem with Councils is that there isn’t any competition – and that isn’t such an easy thing to fix.

So what else is going on?

Let’s talk about Turangi buses: Okay it hasn’t gone away, Waikato Regional Council (WRC) are still working in the background to help make a commuter bus service happen. Yes it will require some cash injection (around $170K apparently), and just a month or so ago it was mentioned to us that WRC might have even had some spare funds available – but the fuel crisis has squashed that opportunity, because just like everybody else the diesel prices are hitting them hard too. Our view is simple: if we want to secure long-term funding from New Zealand Transport Agency (NZTA), we need a service that people genuinely use. We’re now trying to work constructively with WRC on options that improve capacity while keeping the service practical for commuters and day users alike, so watch this space and it needs to be decided before the next WRC Transport Committee meeting in June for a September 2026 kickoff.

Chance to meet a Councillor: The first of Taupo District Council Councillor Connnect forums is kicking off next week, so why not come along and meet your favourite Councillor? No promises yet from me, except I will at least be at the 5th May one next week in Chambers.

Councils could or might get GST: It would certainly help things quite a lot says Roger Partridge in this article which you can read HERE. I thought this statement of his below spells it out why quite well enough:

Could be costing us too: Rotoruas waste charges just got higher, and all because their hole in the ground got full and they have to truck it out of district. The current consent for the Taupo landfill is currently up for review, and if that doesn’t happen we could be in for the same. There is a working group of Elected Members negotiating with local hapu now, I am not part of that, but gather for better or worse their input is apparently fairly crucial to the equation. So watch this space because it WILL affect you.

Unethical behaviour, or acting in the peoples best interest? Hard to say from here, and I know not to take at face value any mainstream media headlines like the one you can read HERE. I am fairly confident that Dunedin Councillor Benedict Ong believes he is doing the right thing, but what even really is that? Anyway he is being censored for breaching Code of Conduct, but I know that is just a wet bus ticket to be ignored if he wants and still turn up to Council Chambers for another round. Local Government Politician – about the only job apart from self-employment where you can’t be fired (except every three-years at election time).

Politicians in town this Wednesday, and they even want to charge for it: A bit cheeky if you ask me, but I suppose with petrol prices they need the help.

What is a Council? I was sent this post by Matthew Horncastle which I will repeat below, quite a nice summary I think of what a Council SHOULD be:

Fridays Fable of Fortitude, and oh how appropriate for the pickle we find ourselves now:

Fridays Fixing Bayonets

24 April 2026

Daniel 1:8: “But Daniel purposed in his heart that he would not defile himself with the portion of the king’s delicacies, nor with the wine which he drank; therefore he requested of the chief of the eunuchs that he might not defile himself”.

I had the Biblical character of Daniel pointed out to me twice this week as relevant to positions like mine in secular governance, and the analogy is apt. It is every bit akin to a den of lions, and it takes more than just willpower to overcome the gravity of this world which pulls so hard. Great men, and women, are required to pull this nation back to the greatness it once was and can still be. So stand firm wherever you are, and dare to stand alone. Because others will see and follow.

Council was simmering this week and not a whole lot to report, except it has struck me that the effort to uplift it from its current setting can be extraordinarily hard and perhaps isn’t really worth the sacrifice. Where we have landed I believe, is a place quite different to the past when there was tension in the system to keep a lid on. A time when there was common purpose and intent, and a real sense of public service. I say systemic failure is why rates keep rising, and unless the current system changes the only way I see for tension to be applied is from above – not governments so much because they come and go – but from those you elect to locally govern. What would a true Anzac do?

However, for those you elect to make that change, they have to be able to have their say. Last week Rotorua Councillor Robert Lee walked out of a Council meeting because he was prevented from asking questions of staff (you can view his social media post including the exchange HERE and read the media story about it HERE). I have received that sort of treatment many times before in my three or so years on Taupo District Council, and continue to still do so (local sleuth Sophia M Smith also wrote a recent piece on the topic HERE). At the end of the day, it is 100% the responsibility of the Chairperson to stop this nonsense happening and nobody else, so in Councillor Lee’s case his Mayor was undoubtedly complicit. My number one 2025 election pledge was to Restore Democracy in Council Chambers, because if that doesn’t happen then nothing worthwhile afterward can. Perhaps I should start to walk out more often, what do you think?

On that note I attempted to table a Notice of Motion for next weeks Council meeting which you can read HERE, but thus far have been thwarted by Chief Executive Julie Gardyne’s direct application of a technicality belying one of the very things I am wishing to highlight:

To cut a long story short, my notice was submitted a couple of hours after their official deadline (which I still dispute the interpretation of), and neither the Chief Executive or Mayor are so far willing to exercise their discretion to accept even as a late item. So I guess you will probably have to wait another month to hear how it goes down. Ugh, moving right along…

A couple of workshops we did have this week included a workshop on Property Revaluations which you can watch HERE. Not a lot of consequence that I can recall from that, except that one thing which could make a big difference was not a topic of discussion – Differential ratios between business/commercial and residential. The current setting in Taupo is 1.8 and apparently has been for quite some time, and it would take a Long Term Plan (LTP) round of probably controversial public consultation to amend – because changing that figure would shift the rates burden to either side of the equation. So its not something this Council would lightly dare to touch without much consideration, but I think could contemplate. Of interest a Chatgpt scan of settings elsewhere around the country (shown right) demonstrates that figures can vary widely.

There was a Taupo Airport Authority (TAA) workshop on a proposed District Plan change which you can watch HERE. I have been on the TAA committee the past three years, and it surprised me that there had been little or no protective designations already in place as with most other airports, so I don’t see this as very controversial and just needs to be played out.

There was also a lengthy workshop for Elected Members on Tuesday entitled “Long Term Plan Wrap Up”, and despite all the previous LTP workshops being public viewable was held behind closed doors on the spurious grounds of “the possibility that sensitive material will be addressed, including that they may impact staff employment”. Myself and at least one other Councillor disputed beforehand that there was no justification to keep things under wraps, and as far as I am concerned there was virtually no sensitive material discussed and it certainly was never mentioned the laying off of swathes of staff. Not that the four-hour workshop was riveting viewing or anything, and I rather suspect that certain Elected Members don’t want people to see their commitment to reigning in rates isn’t perhaps quite as strong as some of their election campaigning spoke to. But I did mention that the $70M bridge over the Waikato was surreptitiously put into the last LTP without the required debate, which Deputy Mayor Kevin Taylor probably wouldn’t want you to hear about because he was instrumental to make that happen. And that places like Waikato District Council which managed to achieve a below inflation rates increase this coming year are anomalies which are best not talked about…because they probably fiddled the numbers anyway.

At the outset of the workshop staff presented us with three options: A/ Implement proposed rates cap range of 2-4% from July 2027; B/ Transition to a rates cap range of 2-4% by July 2029; or C/ Wait until 2029 to comply. Instead of any debate, vote or even show of hands, the discussion morphed into something resembling what I have seen every year last term:

Things are tough, we’re doing our best, see it could be worse, now give it a rest.

(Yawn) so apart from all that, what else is going on?

Daring to be Davina: Kings Counsel Colin Judd gives a stirring inditement of Far North Councillor Davina Smolders brave stand against her own bunch of miscreant members elect which you can read HERE. This is a story really worth following and Shane Jones ill-thought words about it I am sure will come back to haunt him. Local Government Minister Simon Watts says he is looking into it and will have a response in about a month. I hope all this publicity makes a difference, because any time I have called on Ministers to help out the response has always been the same: “its a local issue that needs to be dealt with locally”. Not this time around Minister Watts, its time to do your job. But one of KC Judd’s comments stuck with me as quite relevant to the Taupo JMA saga we have going on.

On that note, I was recently sent this 2011 thesis by a Sonja Hancock entitled “Joint Management Agreement between Taupo District Council and Ngati Tuwharetoa: A Summary of lessons for local government”. If we put aside the accusations of me scaremongering for a moment, why don’t you read the concluding paragraph for yourself:

Also on that seeming endless note, I submitted some legal and financial questions about the JMA which you can read HERE and which our Chief Executive neatly deflected. If this Council gets it wrong which it very well could, I perceive an expensive Judicial Review is just around the corner because there are people out there to make it happen. Question is though – will they carry it through?

Late item on Council spending: I used my discretion to include this letter to Mayor and Councillors from intrepid retired engineer and Taupo resident Phil Shields, and his final statements are precisely on point (except I think we do need consultants some of the time):

Fridays I don’t know why but this just struck a nerve for me:

Fridays Stay and Fight or Walk Away?

10 April 2026

Quote for the week: “F… Off” (Mayor Moko Tepania of Far North District Council)

Genesis 16:11-12: “Behold, you are with child, and you shall bear a son. You shall call his name Ishmael, because the Lord has heard your affliction. He shall be a wild man; His hand shall be against every man,
And every man’s hand against him. And he shall dwell in the presence of all his brethren“.

I am no Biblical scholar, but am aware that Ismael the first son of Abraham is said to be the ancestor of Northern Arabs and of the prophet Muhammed himself. That Moslems have been the biggest challenge to Christianity for the past 1000 years or so is fairly indisputable, unless you wish to also count the anti-God movement which enveloped the Western and Communist world since Darwin times of the 19th century – but I am increasingly now seeing that as only a historical blip. The significant majority of people in this world believe in one God who created everything, but its the question of which God that still divides us.

Greetings people, and although we haven’t had much formal happenings in Council this past week there are certainly a few things going on in the background like a few wars. The fuel crisis doesn’t seem as if it will be letting up very soon, and quite ironically we have all the petrolheads descending on this town for the Supercar meet. I am not one myself and can generally think of better things to do, but I plan to check it out on Sunday when the exciting weather is expected to arrive and there might be some exciting crashes (Councillors get complimentary tickets). But unfortunately some saner heads than mine have prevailed to reschedule all the big races to finish up Saturday. Having said all that, we do actually get a bit happening here compared to say, a place like Ashburton, and although the loads of people can at times get tiresome at least Taupo can’t be accused of being too sleepy.

This week we just had an Elected Member induction session on cybersecurity and AI, and one worthwhile thing I did learn is that if you accidentally press the wrong button on your phone which goes to one of those dodgy sites which access all your data – immediately press the “Airplane” mode to cease the connection and hopefully prevent further damage. Another viable alternative is to right there and then totally demolish your phone, but the former option is easier and cheaper.

We also yesterday had the second of our Water Services Committee meetings, and if you are interested in water infrastructure I really do recommend you have a watch of the 90 min meeting HERE with the minutes and agenda as always available HERE. We had a very informative presentation by Council asset manager wastewater Michael Cordell about the state of wastewater infrastructure (from about the 2 min mark), and afterwards some discussions about water services policy. The Taupo Wastewater plant in particular is facing some immediate future challenges, with the new wastewater standards in place that more severely limit how much nitrogen we are allowed to dispense to the currently irrigated land disposal sites – Houston, we have a problem. I’ll leave a couple of the relevant slides below, and note that the dotted line forecast departs the current reality in 2027 which is very soon.

My greatest question about this committee and its stated policy objectives is this (and I am not alone):

Will we be testing value for money and affordability, or is the primarily focus on monitoring delivery and compliance?

Thus far, it seems to be heading towards the latter. and I am not assured this committee will not become the tick-boxing exercise I strongly suspect it will. Because you will be the ones paying for it, and there is unfortunately no rates cap going to be in place to affect this very substantial aspect of Council spending.

And as far as drinking water is concerned, as I see it Elected Members in this Water Services Committee have two main objectives: 1/ Ensuring that money is spent wisely; and 2/ Ensuring that drinkable water delivered to constituents is safe. The water regulator and Ministry of Health are not responsible for satisfying these outcomes – we are. And are we over-investing to meet regulatory requirements that is beyond what delivers real community benefit? I strongly suspect that we are, because the benefits versus costs are simply not being measured.

Apart from that, we have:

Joint Management Agreement saga continues: This week Taupo Mayor John Funnell put out a statement about the JMA which you can read HERE that caused quite a stir with Maori Ward Councillor Wahine Murch put out her own social media response HERE where she asserts the Mayor has got it wrong:

“Of particular concern are comments suggesting the JMA would result in “ratepayers being governed by people they cannot remove at an election.” This misrepresents the agreement. JMAs do not transfer governance of our district; they provide a statutory framework for joint management with partners like the Tuwharetoa Māori Trust Board. Mischaracterising it in this way can create unnecessary confusion and alarm” (Councillor Wahine Murch).

I wouldn’t have put it quite the same way as Mayor Funnell did, because in my mind since this JMA retains much of the ultimate decision making to Elected Members then that means it is technically more of a “co-management” rather than co-governance agreement. But there the hair-splitting ends, because I say that enmeshing any private entity into Council operations as the current draft JMA is proposing to do will absolutely have undue influence to Council affairs – it is foolish or naive to think otherwise.

On that note, ACT MP Cameron Luxton put out a social media message recently that pointedly reflects to where places like Taupo find ourselves now (snippet below):

And while we are on that theme, a lot of people including myself are very inspired and impressed by Councillor Davina Smolders of Far North District Council who was this week speaking out against her own Council on the Duncan Garner podcast which you can watch HERE. Man oh man, I thought I had it tough here, but that place is a world apart in terms of the abuse and threats she has copped for speaking out. You really need to hear it for yourself, including that their Mayor Moko Tepania is acting like a complete nob and telling Duncan to F… Off. I know that I give Mayor John Funnell a hard time on occasion, but he has never told me to do that. I really do hope for the sake of Far North constituents that the government steps in to sort that mess out, and it really does sound like a mess. If you want to follow Davina’s exploits you can find her Facebook page here and I have already ticked subscribe.

Duncan bleating on: Although it seems trivial by comparison to the above, to follow up on my failed Notice of Motion last Tuesday to elevate Elected Members to a level playing field with members of the public in terms of freedom of expression in our own Council Chambers, I put together a subtitled version of the unfolding 30 min drama which you watch HERE. I learned a few important things from that experience: (i) we have a Chairman Mayor who doesn’t understand that when you give the majority an opportunity to quench the minority, they will take it almost every time; (ii) our first term Councillors (with the notable exception of Cr Woodward) do not yet appreciate the value of free expression in Council Chambers; (iii) I had assumed this matter was 1 + 1 = 2 to understand, but some voiced reservations by even those voting in support may have swayed some fence-sitters to vote against (only myself and Cr’s Rankin, Greenslade, Woodward voted in support, with the rest against and the Mayor abstaining). So behind the scenes diplomacy in advance is obviously required for even the most basic of propositions to change a status quo, which this surely was.

Councils are not signatories to the Treaty: Michael Laws (who happened to get a A+ on a Treaty of Waitangi paper at university) reminds us on his recent podcast. In this he points out a relatively recent court decision from Marlborough where it was affirmed that Councils are not signatories and have no stipulated obligations to the Treaty of Waitangi. Now I don’t always like what Michael Laws has to say and at times he can be downright rude, but on his call for complete reform of local government to sort out the total mess its in including stuff like this, I totally agree.

Transport going Nuclear? As your representative to the Waikato Regional Transport Committee on Friday I attended the second workshop for the Transport Long Term Plan which you can watch HERE. If transportation is your area of interest I do recommend it worth tuning in, because we are at the stage of putting down all the priorities that will contribute towards where quite a lot of money will go. Okay its not edge of your seat stuff and Taupo is certainly the most strained district in the region for this aspect, but I managed to poke in about a few things. Hamilton Councillor Sure Moroney pretty much outed herself as an avowed climate warrior who several times piped up with comments to the effect that we should be getting all cars off the road. I almost laughed out loud when she also effectively stated that economic prosperity is linked to dependence on fossil fuels! I commented that the last government exacerbated the current fuel crisis because it stupidly pretended we could do without oil, gas and the Marsden Point refinery, or even sensible speed limits – but if in the future we decided to go nuclear then things could turn around. Taupo already has some cooling towers, so why can’t we just build a few more?

Help for the Homeless: Rotorua has a free laundry and shower service for the homeless which is now closing to some dismay. This article only caught my eye because of recent discussions in Chambers about the future of the Superloo toilets in Taupo town centre that is frequented by homeless for a similar purpose, and is being mooted for removal of its shower service because of security concerns. I am in two minds about this – on the one hand we don’t want public facilities turned into unsightly or hazardous places to frequent, but on the other shouldn’t we be offering a helping hand to those most in need? The problem is that these things never come for free, and the Rotorua facility is ceasing because the government funding ceased. I see an opportunity here for some local philanthropy.

Fridays lesson on how to think of your average local politician:

Thursday (not Friday) Depths of Despair

2 April 2026

“The mountain groaned, and gave forth a mouse”

Genesis 8:20: “Then Noah built an altar to the Lord, and took of every clean animal and of every clean bird, and offered burnt offerings on the altar” (NKJ)

Easter is about sacrifice and death, but it is also about resurrection and life. Animal sacrifice is an important theme found throughout the Bible, because: “without the shedding of blood there is no forgiveness (Hebrews 9:22). So although animal lovers might be repelled, it is so written. Jesus died for us to live forever if we can bend to seek His forgiveness, for the things we have done and the things we are yet to do. So you can commiserate on Friday, but do remember to celebrate on Monday. For He is Risen.

Councillor Duncan here on with your Friday update on a THURSDAY, because its just not cricket to put things out on an Easter Friday. And I am afraid that I have some bad news: There is no serious commitment in Chambers to cap rates to inflation, and most of your Elected Members don’t realise they are politicians. Perhaps some of the below will help unpack that, and I apologise if it seems a bit of a hodgepodge. This follows the Tuesday 31 March Council meeting which went for an epic four hours (that’s what happens when you try to pack too much stuff into an agenda). For those really keen you can watch the whole thing HERE, but for the more time pressured I will put some timestamped highlights below. You can also read the agenda and minutes HERE.

Lets start with this: Some of you may recall that one of my 2025 campaign pledges was to Restore Democracy in Council Chambers? What we have going on at Taupo District Council is quite a stunted version of democracy, because right now Elected Members have less freedom of expression in Chambers than a member of the public – yes really. Thinking this should be a simple enough job to fix, and because our Mayor refuses to do it himself even though he could have unilaterally decided in a heartbeat, I tried to remedy this nonsensical situation with my Item 5.2 Notice of Motion to introduce a “General Matters” item to Council agendas. To my bewilderment, I was then subjected to a barrage of disparate accusations and assertions which left me so angry I was barely able to stay in the room afterwards. You can watch the 30 min debacle HERE, read my Notice of Motion HERE, and for a transcript of my introductory presentation read HERE. As heartening as it was that Councillors Rankin, Greenslade and Woodward were backing me up, the fact of the matter is that we have a significant majority of Elected Members who would rather silence themselves than have to listen to the likes of us. That is now the shameful reality of this sorry Council Chambers, and entirely to blame is the Mayor for allowing it to happen. Ugh, somebody…anybody…please get me outta here.

Rates Cap Renege: In other news, this new Council is not going to be tagging rates to inflation any time soon. There are some voiced intentions, and a few promising signs that staff are starting to contemplate frugal spending more seriously than before – but there is zero commitment from Elected Members to actually start making it happen this coming financial year. That means that there still is no bottom line, and some of you are going to get kicked out of your homes because you cannot afford the rates and insurance. You can watch about it during Item 5.6 Annual Plan 26/27 – Draft Financial Direction HERE. It is sad, but also quite maddening – because an answer recently popped up as obvious enough to me. Last year this Council earned $5M profit from land sales on Crown Road, and instead of using it to offset this coming years rates rises is instead putting it all towards paying off the $200M or so debt we already owe (saving around $200K of interest payments). You can watch the discussion about that during Item 5.8 Request to Approve Use of Strategic Property Reserve to Pay Down Debt HERE. Don’t get me wrong, I do believe that clearing debt is a good thing. But we also have a Mayor who pledged in his campaign to not let rates exceed inflation, and like a few other things is having not very much to say about it.

From the original forecast of 6.7%, Council recently announced that we are now looking at 6.6% – so a drop of 0.1%, or $100,000 from the total rates intake.

The mountain has indeed groaned, and let forth a mouse.

A positive take but not entirely: I happen to think that we are in a period of flux that won’t last forever – in other words, I am an optimist. When any business has it too easy for too long it becomes bloated with inefficiencies, as anybody who has ever worked in a Council for any length of time will probably agree. Putting a lid on things with a rates cap does mean that a change in outlook is required, and that doesn’t just happen overnight. Despite some of the negative press I sometimes exude, I do actually have faith that the staff of Taupo District Council are capable of thinking outside the square, but also that a more pressured environment is a required incentive to make it happen. Already we are talking about selling off Council assets like reserves, and a Bed Tax to fund things like Destination Great Lake Taupo as happens elsewhere (Rotorua, apparently). So I say: Yes we CAN do it, and until then we should be giving immediate relief to constituents where possible. But we aren’t going to be doing that.

Item 5.7 Establishment of Mangakino-Pouakani and Tongariro Representative Group Committees watch from HERE caused something of a stir with especially Councillors Greenslade and Woodward who viewed the new status of their Turangi and Mangakino committees as a downgrade along with deleted remuneration for the Chairs. I know these small community Councillors get a lot more community flak compared to urban ward Taupoites like me, although it seems I unfortunately dropped the ball when it came to voting on the remuneration aspect and actually voted against their interests – sorry girls my bad – although it looks like the rest of the room was also against. All I can say is that I am glad that I am not a small community Councillor, because it looks like quite hard work.

And in other news:

Turangi Buses, Ferries Galore: On Wednesday Councillor Sandra Greenslade posted a roaster of an April Fools on the Turangi Noticeboard (see below) which took quite a few people in and even got reported in the Waikato Times, but there is a dark side of this which does need retelling once again. Waikato Regional Council have told us that if we get $170K together then they will add a five-day a week Taupo-Turangi 33 seater bus service with timetable of our choice, but discussions about it in Chambers of late have fallen very flat indeed. Apparently this Council is too poor to afford anything much at all really, even to relieve an urgent community need at a crucial time as this. To be honest I really thought this would be something right up Mayor Funnell’s rescue mindset alley, but apparently not if the absence of decisive words or action is anything to go by. After all, if Auckland and Christchurch are now deciding to urgently prioritise public transport because people can’t afford to run their cars, why can’t we? One urban planning lecturer is even promoting that if the government spent $300M nationwide for free buses for a year it would be cheaper than some of the other ideas being floated.

Thursday fun day at the marae: I’d like to be able to tell you how it all went down today at the Induction with Ngāti Tūrangitukua for Councillors and Staff at their Turangi marae, but I decided not to attend. You see when three years ago I attended much of it was presented in a language I didn’t understand, and I noticed that activist Tina Porou will once again be presenting her version of Council obligations to the Treaty of Waitangi and probably the sins of colonialism too. My biggest concern (apart from an entire day out of my life to no great purpose): this marae visit also serves as an induction for Council staff (nine carloads of them, apparently). Having said that, I do recall there was a welcoming air and the luncheon was quite fine – and I realised much later, probably paid for out of the annual $500K fund set aside for “improving Iwi relations“.

Soothsayer Duncan says: This has been sitting with me now for quite a while, but I feel after the defining moment of Tuesday this is the right moment to say aloud. Except for sorting out the Joint Management Agreement (JMA) which seems to be Mayor John Funnell’s main purpose to be there, he has reneged on all the other election platforms which I recall (my paraphrasing): Capping Rates to Inflation = Too Hard (after looking at the books…); Greater Transparency = Even Less (advocating for Code of Silence sessions for Councillors); Referendum for JMA = Remember That Idea?; and Greater Democracy in Chambers = Tyranny of the Majority (example described previous). If I were in his place and didn’t need the money, I reckon that I’d be planning my departure by now. Take it or leave it, and I’m just saying.

On Propaganda: Rates are going up – but are you looking at it like a Rachel, or a Duncan?

Fridays just because its there:

Friday Cuts Which Matter

6 March 2026

To live is to grieve, to die is to not. Whoever has never grieved has never lived – they are only dead.

Genesis 1: 1-3: “In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters. And God said, Let there be light: and there was light”.

Evolutionists who believe the Earth is billions of years old and that we came from monkeys have much greater faith than I, because as an engineer I know that good design doesn’t just happen by accident and no matter how long. Genesis 1 is about the beginning of the world, and I believe it happened that way. According to the chronology of Biblical characters and following its timeline through to Jesus, the world is roughly 5000 years old only. Here we have the world being created in just six days, and there is just one thing about all of this which I still find intriguing: The definition of a day is that it is one revolution of the earth – 24 hours of our time – right? But until the sun was created on the Fourth day, then that means there can’t have been any revolutions, so what exactly did one day represent on Days One to Three? But I am not stuck on it, and it doesn’t matter much to me.

This week in Council we Elected Members started to have a crack at the Long Term Plan (LTP), or rather the staff presented to us a bunch of material to start educating us just what it is all about (remember, some of us are only new to this). If you really want to, you can watch all three and a half hours of the workshop proceedings HERE (yawn).

These 10-year LTP’s are done every three years, in between which we just have the regular Annual Plans (AP’s). The last one was 2024-34, and we are already making a start on the one for 2037-37. It is really quite important actually, because now is the time we set the financial targets which matter for the next three years after. However I have come to realise that in the real world a 10 year plan is fairly spurious to guarantee anything at all really, and anyway we also have elections in between. A brief look below at the three previous LTP forecasts will make that abundantly clear, where you can see that every three years we are promised just a couple of years rates spike before things settle down -but they never actually do.

Perhaps I am just a simpleton, but I believe a good starting point for this process would have been to decide a rates target tagged to the consumer inflation which constituents experience – and just reverse engineer it from there. Just like any responsible householder or private business, and if that is motivation to think smarter and build smaller then that’s just what we need to do. Because the maths isn’t very complicated – people on fixed incomes simply won’t be able to afford to live in their own homes if we don’t act soon. A few of the other Elected Members seem to think this is impossible, but I just see it as a fact of life that we better get used to.

Reasons given by those sceptical that things can be reigned in can pretty much be summed up as: Because the government tells us to. I instead say that we are elected to work for the best interests our constituents, and Wellington is quite a long way away. And by the way, whatever happened to the good old Kiwi No.8 wire mentality to get a job done?

Anyway I did also make a little suggestion with regard to libraries, and that is that I would like to see them open on Sunday’s and one weekday evening just like a lot of other places and where I grew up. Because working people are usually busy Monday through Friday, and Saturdays can get pretty busy too. I think we should be able to manage it without increasing costs if we consider closing a weekday in lieu, and we also have an annual budget of $300K for new library books that may be able to be tapped into. Perhaps I am biased because I love books, but I reckon libraries are one of the few Council run places which give wildly great value for money. And here is something I only found out recently: $300K seems a lot for new books, and somebody has to decide which ones to buy – so why not make a request for a book you want? It may very well end up in the collection for others to enjoy.

Okay so what else?

Joint Management Agreement (JMA) saga continues: This week I had quite a pleasant surprise to be anonymously forwarded by a very smart constituent these two documents HERE and HERE, which make a number of assertions about its true cost to the average person and Council at large. Like say, an additional $3-6K and 3-5 weeks delay for every non-notified consent application, or $45-95K and 5-9 months delay if you want a notified Plan change. The person who put all of this together is no simpleton, and even if some of the figures turn out to be spurious then it is up to Council staff to push back. Next week I am going to ask them to exactly do that.

Conflict of Interest But Only if You Declare It: I have worked out that a loophole in this game of local body politics is that conflicts of interest are left almost at the complete discretion of individual elected members to proclaim. As I see it at present, the only thing that really matters is the court of public opinion, and things greatly need to be tightened up. This topic came up of late with this social media post regarding a speculated conflict of interest involving Taupo Ward Councillor Yvonne Westerman and her associated Bayleys real estate business doing sales for Council properties on Crown Road. The current limit of local financial interest for elected members is a paltry $25K per annum, which is probably just a fraction of the commission on just one of these land sales. I have had ludicrous conflict of interest accusations hurled my way before, but this is not one of those. I am hoping that the current governments attempts to clean up local government will address this large gap, but am not prepared to wager on it.

Turangi bus commuters could lose an hour: Okay recall a few weeks ago that I mentioned about Waikato Regional Council (WRC) having a relook at our public transport? Well it seems they have come up with a cunning plan to make things better for Turangi bus commuters by adding another days scheduled service to the current Mondays and Thursdays – but is it really? Somebody travelling to Taupo for the day currently gets around three hours to do their business before the return trip beckons, but the draft regime now being proposed is reducing this envelope to two hours only. Even with the proposed 33 seat bus for the Turangi service (the current bus seats only 12), a few people I have talked to including Turangi Councillor Sandra Greenslade and a handful of passengers as I took a trip for the first time yesterday (it was much more enjoyable than driving that windy route, and very cheap at just $7) think it could turn out to be quite a white elephant, because fewer people – not more – would probably subscribe to this lesser value service. Anyway I am heading off to Hamilton on Monday to try and talk some sense into them before it happens, and if it does happen is scheduled to happen in May with the draft timetable shown below:

And by the way, it has been inferred that a reason we don’t have an online booking system to guarantee a bus seat (like they do in Taumaranui, and by the way Turangi bound passengers have occasionally been stranded in Taupo before because too few seats) – is because it is felt that some older people in our district can’t handle digital transactions.

Anyway, I think if WRC had a bit more vision for the future, we would be looking at something more like this:

Cash no good and its staying that way: Following last week’s Public Forum presentation by Tristan Baynham regarding his disquiet and cash payments being disallowed at the Taupo Landfill from last August, Elected Members had a round table chat about it on Tuesday. Long story short – there is about a zero chance that decision will be reversed. But interestingly, there were two more reasons mentioned that actually seem to make sense. Balancing the books can apparently be a more than trifling hassle with cash, and there is a big thing around cash handling by staff with the presented temptation for them to make off with it. I am sure that Councillor Christine Rankin knows all about that with her recent Hospice experience which made the news. So for a few reasons there seems to be a strong case against the use of cash, and a few of them probably haven’t been mentioned up until now for sensitivity reasons. But I am not so sensitive to withhold it from you.

Sophie’s at it again: Local investigator/reporter Sophie M Smith put out a very interesting piece just yesterday, well I am very interested anyway. It is entitled “Part 1 – The Council Building Question: Starting at the Beginning“. Hooray, because I have been reckoning for ages that this would be a great subject to tackle for Elected Members to actually learn something from past mistakes instead of being continually placated and moving on to the next thing. You can read Sophies Facebook post HERE, and her main article HERE. Part 1 is just the introduction and I very much look forward to reading more. Good on ya Sophie, this has to be one of the biggest blunders this Council made the past few decades and it needs a light shone on it to ensure mistakes like it don’t happen again.

Get stuffed Wellington: Auckland Mayor Wayne Brown says no to Minister for Housing Chris Bishops information request. Its a fairly bland article, but I think the most interesting part of this story is that the Deputy Mayor is publicly disagreeing with Wayne and that Chris Bishop is not insisting on getting his piece of meat. Taupo is not as big and brutish as Auckland, but we should start sticking up for ourselves more to not get pushed around

Fridays why everyone is leaving New Zealand: I think this is a pretty good summary, and the solution seems pretty obvious to me: