29 May 2026
However weird churches can be and however flawed its participants, Christians are not meant to live in a cave. Hebrews 10:24-25: “And let us consider one another in order to stir up love and good works, not forsaking the assembling of ourselves together, as is the manner of some, but exhorting one another, and so much the more as you see the Day approaching”.
So people about the great amalgamation, where are we with that? Next week or so this Council will be asking for your feedback, just like some other Councils like Western Bays are currently doing. At least Western Bays have narrowed it down to just five options, but Taupo which is in the middle of no fewer than eight other Councils – none of which we have ever seriously entertained the thought of working more closely with – is not so lucky. And yes, as Epitome of Coolness has been pondering in her recent article, Chatham Islands has even been floated. But given that the Department of Internal Affairs (DIA) has previously mentioned to us that transport and water catchments are key factors of consideration, I am not sure we will get very far with that as an idea (and DIA are the ones who receive these Head Start proposals due 9 August and make their recommendations to the Minister). Transport is far more relevant to those bordering cities because not much point in one side of the border building a four-lane expressway if the other won’t budge, so given that we have a lake which feeds to about a third of the nations population, my estimation is that the gravitas will inexorably be northwards towards the rest of the Waikato, perhaps as far as Hamilton.
Checking out the Taxpayers Union page of Waikato Councils, Taupo isn’t looking like such a desirable partner if debt per household is a factor of consideration, with only Rotorua and Hamilton looking a lot worse … and what’s up with Waipa? Rotorua Mayor Tania Tapsell seems to be suggesting in her recent docial media post the option of an alliance from Taupo to Maketu based on awa and Iwi makeup, and in a Rotorua meeting reported in local media the DIA’s Future of Local Government deputy executive director, Sarah Polaschek, apparently said that “proposals could proceed even without full agreement from all participating councils, provided they meet required thresholds based on population or majority support” – we have received no mention of any population threshold before, so I wonder what that number is? I wonder if the likes of smaller population Otorohunga and Waitomo know about it, because they are already making statements about their proposed merger.
Further north, there is a movement called Northern Action Group Inc which is petitioning for Rodney ward to secede from the supercity Auckland Council union and instead buddy up with rural Kaipara, you can read more in detail about it HERE if you like (I am not sure if this is going to be submitted as part of any official Head Start proposal). Their motto which the likes of Taupo should probably bear in mind if we are going to contemplate going the Hamilton way: PLUNDERED FOR OUR RATES AND RESOURCES! A FREE PLAYGROUND FOR HOLIDAYING AUCKLANDERS! A BACKYARD FOR AUCKLAND’S RUBBISH! URBAN MINDSET BUREAUCRATS AND PLANNERS! OUT OF CONTROL CCOs!
I also managed to have a chat with Ken Turner who is one of the 20 Auckland Councillors who recently opposed (unsuccessfully) to fend off Auckland Mayor Wayne Browns bid for a 7.9% rates increase which is apparently the highest in Supercity history. Apart from his interesting anecdotes about the dictatorial running of Wayne’s 30-odd staffed Mayoral office (the complete opposite of how it works here, but it sounds like a compelling idea) and that 90% of debating time gets devoted to the Auckland CBD, he tells me that although the 21 Community Boards get allocated a seemingly healthy annual budget of some $300M, less than 10 percent is actually able to be discretionarily spent with the rest set in stone for various contracts or another. So the Auckland model for local representation is looking a little shaky in my mind right now, although Ken did assure me that good attention to the nuts and bolts of the thing could make the difference with ringfenced budgets and proper accountabilities (Ken is a mechanic by trade and doesn’t shirk from looking under the hood) – so once we start getting into the detail, he could be a useful person to call.
Okay so that is the big question for now dealt with, what else is going on?
Actually quite important: There is a new bill before parliament right now to try and lessen the power and influence of Chief Executives in local government and increase that of Elected Members. It is MP Stuart Smith’s idea, and it sounds a very good one to me. You can check out the new Bill HERE and watch a Platform interview with the Minister HERE. It reads as most legalese does so quite convoluted, but my hope is for it to make a good difference.
Transparency but only when convenient: We had an open to the public workshop yesterday entitled “Ratings decisions for Annual Plan” which you can watch HERE on youtube. I did not appear in person only online, and viewed the workshop as an exercise in justification which I didn’t have the energy to disrupt. There was a proposal near the beginning which you can watch from HERE about increasing the Uniform Annual General Charge (UAGC) from the current $250 to $425, which will adversely affect residential ratepayers in favour of commercial and all under the banner of “fairness” – so if you are a commercial ratepayer you will be among the happiest. Apart from that: all the excuses in the world as to why we can’t trim the forecast rates increase any less than 6.6% (only 0.1% below the forecast of the previous Long Term Plan (LTP)), and yet somehow other Councils like Wellington manage to do it after consulting with their constituents first. We aren’t even a city with all their infrastructure demands, or a Thames-Coromandel which loses a few bridges every storm, so I find there to be little excuse. Councillor Hope Woodward was asking when Elected Members get to go through the budgets line by line, but the response was basically that we wouldn’t. I couldn’t be bothered repeating about lack of financial accountability and the need for significant financial decisions to be brought before Elected Members for individual evaluation throughout the year rather than once every 12 months at Annual or Long-Term Plan time. So I guess this will be yet another Annual Plan I will be voting the negative to (yawn).
Parks and kindy’s and playful things: We did have a Council meeting on Tuesday where a couple of interesting items did get discussed. You can watch the whole near three hours if you really want HERE with the agendas available HERE, but you have to be quite special to want to do that (I am telling you and another Councillor agrees, if it were last term the meeting would have been done and dusted in under 45 min). Kinloch parents of young children will be happy that the deal for Council to contribute around $0.5M of Development Contributions (DC’s) towards the new kindergarten and reserve proposal by Kinloch Families Trust in Item 5.3 was passed unanimously (you can watch from HERE). I say this is a healthy model for future community partnerships, even though there are some local naysayers around the issue of “opportunity cost” i.e. that the money could have been spent elsewhere.
There was also Item 5.4 Taupo District Wide Reserves Management Plans, which some of you will recall from last week I was questioning the wisdom of proceeding due to the cost and trouble and looming amalgamation. You can watch the proceedings from HERE, including my fair disgust that instead of this item being presented as a decision to proceed or not was just a delegating of the task to the Regulatory Committee. My question about cost was answered that it would involve staff time of around 1.5 FTE (so lets call it around $200K), but that does not include all the time and effort required by everybody else – and these do take 12 – 18 months to get through. My other objections were around: (i) the subjective nature of these being deemed “outdated” just because some are over 20 years old, when the requirement is to keep them continually updated (which really means any Reserve Management plan is outdated the day after it is published); (ii) my once bitten twice shy experience with Motutere, which in my mind was a decision very much influenced by outside minority interest groups and a pre-determined agenda within Council; and (iii) the amalgamation question which means that after 2028 a new Council organisation will probably attempt a revamp in its own mold. So talk about unnecessary, and I am not convinced there are not ulterior motives at play once again – so my recommendation is that you had better watch this space carefully, and yes, the motion was by majority passed.
Oh yes, and there was Item 5.2 which was a Notice of Motion by myself to Acknowledge Standing Orders which you can read below and watch from HERE. It was really an attempt to try and bring about some order in Chambers and reiterate why we are all here, so it never ceases to amaze me that something as benign as this could only receive partial support (Point 1 was rejected, Points 2-6 supported but only by majority). My conclusion: You can table a motion to acknowledge that grass is really green, but unless the egos around the table get sufficiently stroked then it will not get the nod. My Notice of Motion:
Bed tax for Taupo? We had a very interesting submission by Scott Mead who did a 5 min presentation during Tuesdays Public Forum including slides for a form of proposed Bed Tax through rates which you can watch from HERE. He included some info of what other Councils like Wellington and Queenstown are doing, and based on Scott’s calcs we could generate around $2.8M of additional income. Conceivably this could be put towards relieving residential property rates by around 3.4%, or any other purpose Council might come up with. Great presentation Scott, and I for one am keen on following it up.
Where have all the Councillor Koreros gone? Been wondering why messages from Elected Members haven’t been included in the Taupo & Turangi News inserts since election? The plain and simple answer is: CENSORSHIP. The powers that be do not want the Council party line to be dis-coloured by any winds of dissent or disengagement, so that means the only way you will get to hear directly from us is via other channels like social media or this website. Which is a very real shame, because I believe that opinion pieces from Elected Members are exactly what the public want to hear, not everybody uses social media, and we are not servants of the staff who are currently permitted to censor our views. I did receive this response from Mayor John Funnell, and reading between the lines he does not support my view, nor do the majority of current Elected Members who still don’t seem to want to recognise they are politicians. Mayor John: “Any current communication spaces are being redirected to support proposed amalgamation priorities. This means some regular content, including Councillor Kōrero features, will be paused while we focus on ensuring clear and consistent messaging around this work”.
Anyway I will leave you with this disallowed contribution of mine from July 2024, which was dated before the rates caps regime from central government was announced and was deemed by the staff censor to contain “misinformation” (it did not). I wonder which bits they did not want you to hear?
Imagine how much it is worth: Picture taken from Ngauruhoe Street looking down towards the lake over Taharepa Reserve. We are talking around 7 acres of prime near-lakeside real estate, and its not even much good for kicking a ball because it will end up on the road. Any takers to help out a cash strapped Council like ours?
Damn, that was a quick about face!! After the Minister of Education Erica Stanford admitted her Bill targetting homeschoolers was triggered by Gloriavale and she talked to some homeschool protestors at Parliament, there has been a backdown and the Bill will not proceed. Wow, what a turnaround and only in a matter of days too, and it didn’t even take an occupation of Parliament. What on earth is the world coming to, or is it perhaps that its election year?
Fridays are we California or a Texas?
duncandoestaupo.com 