Fridays February We’re Back!

6 February 2026

Okay folks, I’m back and to explain my absence: we have our first Council meeting of the year just yesterday, and until now there really haven’t been any Council happenings worth reporting on since Christmas. Basically over summer your Elected Members had around six weeks off with virtually nothing on our calendars. That is not to say that none of us did community stuff in that period, only that we aren’t called on to debate or decide anything.

Now for the bad news: I do believe our new Mayor is a dud, and I’m calling him out now.

Just like the Mayor before, and just like the past twelve years.

To explain myself:

Some of you may recall my 2025 election #1 priority to Restore Democracy which included to cease and desist the cynical use of Standing Orders to shut down debate and discussion. I can tell you that nothing has changed on that front and it was demonstrated quite clearly at yesterdays Council meeting, when my application to appear in the public forum to give a five-minute presentation was refused by Mayor Funnell – in direct breach of Standing Orders and under the artless claim that ‘an elected member is not a member of the public’.  You can watch the video recording here if you like, and it took several times longer to debate than it would have to simply hear me out. Pitiful, un-necessary, and all of it total bullshit. Basically in order to people please some others, Mayor Funnell decided to squash on me. I was hoping that the Mayor would get the idea after I wrote him this recent letter on freedom of expression for Elected Members, but it obviously didn’t register.

My #2 campaign priority was to Take Back Control of Council, and that means doing transparency for real by making sure that important discussions of Elected Members be audio-visual recorded for public record. Because so many times have I experienced the dark hole of that place, that I now count anything not done in the public arena simply doesn’t matter. The topic of my presentation: Delegated Authority of Elected Members. The current setting at Taupo District Council is that the Chief Executive has almost total unfettered control of financial expenditure with little accountability to Elected Members – and that is just mental. But they didn’t want you to hear about it, nor of the change made in 2021 which you never heard about to make it so. You see, they simply don’t want to be embarrassed by the fact that probably hundreds of dollars could have been shaved off your annual rates bill, if responsible fiscal oversight hadn’t been just willingly given away in a debate which probably lasted all of three minutes.

What has Mayor Funnell got to do with all this, you ask? Because he is the one who been delaying and deferring about my offered presentation on this topic since before Christmas, and he almost certainly doesn’t want it aired in public view. This is despite his campaign pledge for transparency and accountability, and along with his commitment to tie rates to inflation (which won’t be happening any time soon) – I do believe we are experiencing just another windbag politician. I was really hoping these next three years weren’t going to be a repetition of the last – and to be fair, we have some spirited newly elects who won’t let that entirely happen – but without firm and wise leadership at the helm I am already seeing the writing on the wall. Leadership isn’t taking a vote on every decision under the sun which is within the Mayor’s authority to make (as happened yesterday with the public forum) – instead that is a recipe for the continued tyranny of the majority. Just. Like. Before. And if we can’t even get the democratic institution of Council Chambers working properly where Elected Members are able to talk freely or even be granted equivalent speaking rights of an attending member of the public – there really isn’t any point of having elections at all. Making any worthwhile changes to the current direction set by the Chief Executive simply becomes impossible.

However I do believe in Miracles and make no claim to 100% know the future, and perhaps this post will help push for drastic change and very soon.

Okay apart from all that which was quite regrettable to have to write, what else do we have going on?

Community Forums/ Committees / Representative Groups / or Whatever: You may be aware that a bunch of talkfests have been happening the month of January about the way Council engages with communities going forward, and I turned up to a few of these myself. To be honest I haven’t taken great interest in this issue, because I believe that the mechanism of community engagement is a moot point if Council always just does what it wants to do anyway and irrespective of what the community say – and there are so many examples of that in recent history around here. But it is always good to get out and about every now and then, and I did get to visit the wonderful Waitahanui community hall and meet some of the people there (for one thing, I reckon they could do with a new basketball court). And I was reminded of the No.1 concern for Wairakei people which is their landlocked state with regard to walking and cycling.

Planning Bill Submission is there any point: We did discuss another couple of items on Thursdays meeting, and one of these was Councils submission to the two bills set to replace the Resource Management Act (RMA): the Planning Bill and the Natural Environment Bill (read the minutes here, and watch the recording here from 17 min). I have to say that my own impression of any changes to the consenting process regime can be secondary to the manner it gets applied. In my own profession of transport engineering I have been involved in resource consent process for around 30 years – same RMA as back then, but a great shift in the way Councils have become much more of a hindrance than the help they used to be.  For example I can think of a time when Council officers had to find some very good reasons to justify to management why they want to decline. Now, the situation seems to have flipped 180 degrees so that the applicant has to justify why they deserve to be approved. This may sound like an inconsequential difference, but let me tell you it is not.

Our submission also mentions some trepidation about the Retail Distribution effects, and that we could end up with large Box stores or Malls in the suburbs and the Taupo Town Centre will die (as per places like Rotorua). Until now I had not appreciated that for Taupo this was a concerted policy of the planners, but if I am right to assume that the politics of Taupo is a main bottleneck – then things won’t be changing very much in a hurry anyway.

Climate Change Really? On Thursday we also received a staff paper which was entitled Review of Climate Change Risks (watch here from 46 min). My own thoughts on this topic are that apart for the ski industry and perhaps the odd brush fire, colder climates present greater challenges for this district than warm – and that is just a reflection on human habitation globally which has always flourished more easily in warmer climates. And I do know enough about climatology that things will get colder sooner or later (perhaps much soon than anybody expects), so when that happens it will present a much greater challenge (ski industry excepted).

We were presented with some extrapolations of future flooding, but I do have to admit a degree of scepticism because of two things: 1/ Our blessing of free draining volcanic soils (which is also a curse for farming); and 2/ We have about the mildest weather in the whole of the North Island, and as someone who likes a nice storm every now and then I do so miss the more exciting stuff they get on the Coast. We also confusingly heard that annual rainfall and number of heavy rainfall events are not predicted to increase, so that would mean many more sunny days and I can’t see that as a very bad thing.

Capping Rates Yeah Right: Yesterday we also had a workshop entitled Annual Plan: Initial Budgeting and Direction where staff gave us a heads up opportunity to influence the setting of budgets for the upcoming financial year (the workshop was audio-visual recorded so when that becomes available you can watch it here). I gave it my best shot to advocate that we stick to capping things off to the government imposed maximum of 4.0% even if it won’t be mandatory until 2029, and I am hoping the staff will present us with a decent set of scenarios to make that happen (we are talking around $3M of operational spend reductions). But I am clearly in a very small minority of Councillors prepared to even consider that notion, so it looks like we going to get lumped with the 6.7% as set out in the 2024-2034 Long Term Plan (LTP) and not a smidgen less.

Is this bias or what? Some of you may recall that during our Joint Management Agreement (JMA) workshop in December, I challenged the presenting lawyer, Paul Beverley, over his previous statements that “Māori have a deep and innate relationship with natural resources”, which to me suggests an assumption of environmental authority that not everyone would accept. At the time, he advised this position is reflected in legislation and offered to provide examples. I couldn’t turn down that offer, and a few days ago received the follow-up response from Paul, which you can read here.

After reviewing the material provided, I remain unconvinced that legislation establishes any inherent or exclusive environmental authority. The references cited recognise Māori cultural relationships with the environment, which councils must respect, but they do not require governance concessions beyond statutory obligations.

As elected members, we are expected to rely heavily on professional advice, which makes it even more important that such advice is carefully examined and openly tested. Given the long-term implications of a JMA, it would be prudent to ensure advice is tested from multiple governance perspectives, rather than relying on a single adviser whose philosophical framing and cultural premises may shape outcomes in subtle but significant ways. This JMA will therefore require very careful scrutiny to ensure it remains fair, proportionate, and accountable to all residents of our district. I encourage residents to read the material themselves and stay engaged as this agreement develops.

Speaking of consultants: One of my things to do under my #2 campaign pledge to Take Back Control of Council was for Elected Members to be able get independent opinions for all sorts of things from legal to engineering, and was thinking an annual budget of say $10K per Councillor could be set aside for this purpose. I don’t know of any Councils which have that policy already, but Wellington Mayor Andrew Little apparently did commit to this in his election campaign:“Give Councillors the ability to test the Council’s legal advice through a $50,000 per annum contestable legal advice fund.”I am told that in the last term Wellington had a lot of problems with Council officers telling Councillors they couldn’t do things “due to legal advice”, and sometimes even refusing to even provide Councillors with that advice.  I’m telling ya, this thing is a live issue around the country.

And what about the staff? Yesterday Elected Members also had a staff led training session about the Councils Procurement process, which is pretty much as dry a subject as it sounds. But I took the opportunity to express what I see as its biggest achilles heel and especially as it relates to a provincial town as Taupo: staff qualifications and experience, or lack thereof. Because staff are the ones who set the context and framework of any awarded contracts, so it can totally depend on what they do or don’t know, including what they are unaware of to even know to seek advice on. I have seen this so often in my professional engineering career it is just an assumed thing of the industry, and there is no way it doesn’t also apply here in Taupo.

Wayne Brown doesn’t have manners: Apparently leadership has many different faces, and it isn’t always pretty. Threatening to rearrange a journalists face is not exactly model behaviour from the Dummies Guide to Being a Mayor, but he did it.

JONESIE awards due 12^th February 2026: For those who reckon Council wastes a lot of your money on stupid stuff, you only have another week to make a submission for the Taxpayer Union Jonesie Awards for wasteful government expenditure. You need to get specific examples with a full back story to have a chance of winning, I did have one lined up for submitting but as there is still a chance it won’t happen so might save it for next year. However for anybody out there who does have something I do encourage you to send it in.

Waitangi Day: Oh yes its Waitangi Day.

Fridays Finish Finale Finaali : Even though I have never been there, Canada and Canadians strike me as so similar to New Zealand and New Zealanders just without the sunny beaches. So sit back and enjoy this wonderful piece from my favourite Canadian poet/singer Leonard Cohen with a message to all those with hearts to hear and bear it: