Gaslit Gala of the Smokin’ Mirrors: Northern Access Workshop

26 May 2025

Councillor Duncan of Taupo ward here, reporting to you on my short take of last Thursdays workshop. A fuller summary of this topic is to be found here.

๐Ÿ. ๐“๐ก๐ž ๐†๐š๐ฌ๐ฅ๐ข๐ญ ๐†๐š๐ฅ๐š

โ€œThis is just a workshop.โ€

That line was used like a spell to ward off scrutinyโ€”as if $300,000 in consultant fees doesnโ€™t warrant any questions or need to have come up with a clear way forward.

When I asked why ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฐ๐˜ด๐˜ต ๐˜ฒ๐˜ถ๐˜ข๐˜ญ๐˜ช๐˜ง๐˜ช๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ต๐˜ณ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ด๐˜ฑ๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ต ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜จ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ ๐˜Š๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ๐˜ฏ๐˜ค๐˜ช๐˜ญ was excluded from the steering group or even having any opportunity to contribute, I got:

โ€ข โ€œYou werenโ€™t blockedโ€ (๐˜ ๐˜ธ๐˜ข๐˜ด).

โ€ข โ€œThere was a voteโ€ (๐˜›๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ธ๐˜ข๐˜ด๐˜ฏ’๐˜ต).

โ€ข โ€œThis isnโ€™t the forum for grievancesโ€ (๐˜œ๐˜ฏ๐˜ญ๐˜ฆ๐˜ด๐˜ด ๐˜บ๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ๐˜ณ ๐˜จ๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜ฆ๐˜ท๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ค๐˜ฆ ๐˜ง๐˜ช๐˜ต๐˜ด ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ๐˜ช๐˜ณ ๐˜ฏ๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜ณ๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ท๐˜ฆ).

When I raised alternatives like:

โ€ข tidal flow lanes,

โ€ข public transport modeling,

โ€ข emergency Bailey Bridge contingencies…

โ€ฆI was shut down, reframed, or scolded for โ€œderailing the meetingโ€.

๐Ÿ. ๐“๐ก๐ž ๐’๐ฆ๐จ๐ค๐ข๐ง’ ๐Œ๐ข๐ซ๐ซ๐จ๐ซ๐ฌ

Hereโ€™s the script being sold:

Growth is inevitable. One bridge is failing. A second bridge is the only fix. Trust the experts (๐˜ฆ๐˜น๐˜ค๐˜ฆ๐˜ฑ๐˜ต ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ค๐˜ข๐˜ญ๐˜ญ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ ๐˜‹๐˜ถ๐˜ฏ๐˜ค๐˜ข๐˜ฏ).

What wasnโ€™t done:

โ€ข โŒ No structural assessment of the current bridge (even though we need to keep it going anyway โ€“ so are we going to have to pay for ๐˜ต๐˜ธ๐˜ฐ new bridges not just one?)

โ€ข โŒ No serious public transport scenarios

โ€ข โŒ No evaluation of a three-lane tidal-flow option with a direct Waikato St link

โ€ข โŒ No stated clarity on Mercuryโ€™s actual intentions with the control gates

โ€ข โŒ No proposed public input until 2027

โ€ข โŒ And still no reason given why consultant reports werenโ€™t or still canโ€™t be released ten months after their completion.

So what did we really get for the $300K spent to date? Not very much is all I can tell, except the necessary excuse to increase Development Contribution fees.

And contrary to assertions – Yes, this โ€œnon-decision-making workshopโ€ only happened because I ๐˜ง๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ค๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ it to happen via a Notice of Motion nearly one year ago.

๐‘ช๐’‚๐’๐’ ๐’Š๐’• ๐’˜๐’‰๐’‚๐’• ๐’š๐’๐’– ๐’๐’Š๐’Œ๐’†. ๐‘จ ๐’˜๐’๐’“๐’Œ๐’”๐’‰๐’๐’‘. ๐‘จ ๐’…๐’Š๐’”๐’„๐’–๐’”๐’”๐’Š๐’๐’. ๐‘จ ๐’‘๐’†๐’“๐’‡๐’๐’“๐’Ž๐’‚๐’๐’„๐’†.

Just donโ€™t call it transparency.

Quote for today and itโ€™s from me: โ€œ๐˜ž๐˜ฉ๐˜ข๐˜ต ๐˜ข ๐˜ฑ๐˜ฐ๐˜ญ๐˜ช๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ค๐˜ช๐˜ข๐˜ฏ ๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜ญ๐˜ด ๐˜บ๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ ๐˜ฑ๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜ท๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ฆ ๐˜ค๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ๐˜ฏ๐˜ต๐˜ด ๐˜ง๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ ๐˜ญ๐˜ช๐˜ต๐˜ต๐˜ญ๐˜ฆ. ๐˜๐˜ตโ€™๐˜ด ๐˜ธ๐˜ฉ๐˜ข๐˜ต ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ๐˜บ ๐˜ด๐˜ข๐˜บโ€”๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ฅ๐˜ฐโ€”๐˜ช๐˜ฏ ๐˜ฑ๐˜ถ๐˜ฃ๐˜ญ๐˜ช๐˜ค ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ข๐˜ต ๐˜ฎ๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ดโ€.

Facebook here

Watch the full meeting here:

Leave a comment