โ€œ๐ˆ ๐’๐ฉ๐ž๐š๐ค ๐…๐จ๐ซ ๐“๐ก๐ž ๐“๐ซ๐ž๐ž๐ฌโ€โ€” ๐›๐ฎ๐ญ ๐ง๐จ๐›๐จ๐๐ฒ ๐ž๐ฅ๐ฌ๐ž ๐ฐ๐š๐ฌ ๐ฏ๐ž๐ซ๐ฒ ๐ฆ๐ฎ๐œ๐ก ๐ฅ๐ข๐ฌ๐ญ๐ž๐ง๐ข๐ง๐ 

21 May 2025

In a vote taken where I was the only dissenter, the Taupล Reserves and Roading Committee yesterday (Item 5.4, 20 May meeting) approved the removal of three mature silver birch trees from the Tapuaeharuru lakefront cliffs.

I voted ๐˜ข๐˜จ๐˜ข๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ด๐˜ต this, and hereโ€™s why:

While the erosion of the cliff is real, we were ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฐ๐˜ต ๐˜ฑ๐˜ณ๐˜ฐ๐˜ท๐˜ช๐˜ฅ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ธ๐˜ช๐˜ต๐˜ฉ ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜บ ๐˜ค๐˜ฐ๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜จ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜จ ๐˜ข๐˜ญ๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ฏ๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ท๐˜ฆ. If we are to trade away decades-old treesโ€”public assetsโ€”we should at least be able to explain how much it would have cost to save them. We werenโ€™t and we canโ€™t, so that to me was insufficient grounds to proceed with the undue urgency I felt we were being pressed into.

Are there any tree huggers in Taupล? Iโ€™m not one myself, but suspect that if this were happening in Auckland weโ€™d be hearing about it and loudly. If not, that’s okay. Move along, nothing to see here.

Watch the meeting from 33:46 here

Meeting agenda and minutes here

Facebook here

One thought on “โ€œ๐ˆ ๐’๐ฉ๐ž๐š๐ค ๐…๐จ๐ซ ๐“๐ก๐ž ๐“๐ซ๐ž๐ž๐ฌโ€โ€” ๐›๐ฎ๐ญ ๐ง๐จ๐›๐จ๐๐ฒ ๐ž๐ฅ๐ฌ๐ž ๐ฐ๐š๐ฌ ๐ฏ๐ž๐ซ๐ฒ ๐ฆ๐ฎ๐œ๐ก ๐ฅ๐ข๐ฌ๐ญ๐ž๐ง๐ข๐ง๐ 

Leave a comment